saved
Request for Proposal
Status: RFP is Open

Technology that Prevents Increase in Water Activity of Freeze-dried Bacteria

Request Number
RFP_2019_0112
Due Date
Jul 18
Program Manager

Opportunity
Collaborative research, joint development, licensing, contract manufacturing, and sales of materials

 

Timeline
Phase 1 – Within 6 months before starting of sample testing
Phase 2 – Within two years before completing development of the technology in a lab

Promising research seeds will be reviewed individually as a medium- and long-term project

 

Financials

For solving this technical challenge, the budget is guaranteed (Negotiable depending on the proposal)

 

How to  Apply
  • Click "Respond", complete the form to the extent possible, and submit along with other attachment files available. 
  • After creating your account for NineSights, your draft will be automatically saved and you can resume later from "Control Center". Please note you do not submit confidential information at this process.
  • This request for proposals in PDF format is available here.

 

SOLUTION PROVIDER HELP DESK

If you have any questions or request, please feel free to contact us at: phd2@ninesigma.com

RFP Title

 

Technology that Prevents Increase in Water Activity of Freeze-dried Bacteria
RFP Description

NineSigma, representing a multi-billion-dollar food manufacturer, seeks a technology that prevents the increase in water activity of freeze-dried bacteria in food product. The client aims to maintain the viability of freeze-dried bacteria over a long period of time by preventing the increase in water activity. We also welcome proposals that can improve the viability of freeze-dried bacteria by focusing on the other factors besides water activity. In particular, we expect proposals from organizations that proactively respond to sample testing.

Key Success Criteria

KEY SUCCESS CRITERIA
At the current stage, proposals that satisfy the requirement of either 1) water activity or 2) viability are welcome.

1) The water activity (Aw) of freeze-dried bacteria is maintained at 0.3 or less in substances with Aw>0.6, (including aqueous solution) at cold or room temperature (10–25°C) for 1 month to 1 year.

2) The decrease of viability of freeze-dried bacteria can be lowered under the following conditions:

  • Refrigerated conditions  (10–15°C, 1 month)
  • Room temperature conditions (20–25°C, 1 month-1 year)
  • Frozen conditions  (-18°C, 2 years)

3) Applicable to food
4) Hygienic treatment is possible

Possible Approaches

Possible Approaches

Possible approaches might include, but are not limited to the following. Proposals from a wide range of technology such as chemical and pharmaceutical fields, including technology that has not been applied to food products, are also welcomed.

  • Coating with protective agents
    • Oily (hydrophobic) substance
    • ionic liquid
  • Encapsulation
  • Physicochemical approach
    • Surface treatment (hardening or water repellent treatment etc.)
    • Retaining freeze-dried bacteria in oil drops in water
  • Production process of freeze-dried bacteria
    • Inclusion of viable freeze-dried bacteria in crystals
Items to be Submitted

Background

The client, a leading food manufacturer, is working to produce food products containing freeze-dried bacteria. The viability of freeze-dried bacteria can be maintained for a long time in low water activity, but the viability decreases when the water activity increases. Therefore, it is a challenge to disperse the freeze-dried bacteria in food product without increasing the water activity.

The client has been examining coating technology by using several protective agents, but the effects have not been acceptable. As a result, we decided to seek proposals in order to identify effective technology for preventing the increase in water activity or improving the viability of freeze-dried bacteria from various approaches including coating technology.

 

Notes on Response

Proposal shall have clear points and should not include confidential information. Supplemental files may be submitted in addition to the proposal.

 

Response evaluation

The client will evaluate all responses with the following criteria.

  • Overall scientific and technical merit
  • Approach to proof of concept or performance
  • Economic potential of concept
  • Realism of the proposed plan (action items, timeline, roles, deliverables, cost estimation)
  • Potential for proprietary position
  • Respondents’ capability and related experiences

 

Anticipated Project Process

After reviewing submitted proposals, the client possibly ask clarifying questions before selecting the most suitable candidates for collaboration. The client will select best candidates through evaluations. During the selection process, the client may execute NDA with selected respondents, seek further information disclosure, and discuss specific development targets or potential opportunities.

The client will execute necessary agreements with the selected respondents and move to the advanced development phase. Specifics of any collaboration will be determined through consultation with the concerned parties.

Preferred Collaboration Types
Area of Interest